The Solemn League and Covenant - is it
lawful?
Gillespie answers a friend as to
the taking by oath the Solemn Covenant of uniformed Reformed Orthodoxy.
Whether
it be lawful, just and expedient, that there be an ordinance of
parliament for the taking of the solemn league and covenant, by all
persons in the kingdom, under a considerable penalty; or, an answer
returned to a gentleman who had consulted a friend concerning this
question.
by Rev. George Gillespie
First of all, that I may
rightly deduce and state the matter of fact, it is to be remembered:-
That the solemn league and covenant hath
been the strongest band of union in this common cause of religion and
liberty, and that which the common enemies have mainly endeavored with
all their might to overthrow:
That the chief motive to engage Scotland
was professed to be the reformation of religion, and uniformity
according to the covenant:
That the league and treaty between the
two kingdoms is in pursuance of the ends of the covenants, and that we
should never lay down arms till these were obtained:
That, by order of parliament, the
covenant was turned in Latin, and sent abroad to the reformed churches,
with letters from the Assembly of Divines:
That, upon the former assurances, the
church and kingdom of Scotland, the parliaments of both kingdoms, the
Assembly of Divines, the city of London, and many thousands in England,
have taken the covenant, and have sworn most solemnly that they shall
constantly, really and sincerely, during all the days of their lifetime,
with their lives and fortunes, stand to the performance of it. And both
kingdoms have suffered the loss of their goods, cheerfully laid out
their means, and laid down their lives resolutely in pursuance thereof.
At the treaty of Uxbridge, the
propositions for religion (of which the confirming of the covenant is
the first and chiefest) were acknowledged to be of such excellency and
absolute necessity, as they were appointed to be treated of in the first
place, and that no peace nor agreement should be till they were first
agreed unto. The same propositions for religion are yet set down in the
first place among the propositions sent last to the king, as being
agreed unto by the parliaments of both kingdoms. And now that the king's
answer to the propositions is delayed, the House of Commons have thought
fit to turn the propositions into ordinances, to show their constant
resolution of adhering thereto; and that they may be of greater force,
and receive the better obedience from the subjects, have converted the
propositions for civil matters into ordinances; and (that their zeal and
constancy may appear for religion, which is of greatest moment, and
wherein the glory of God and the good of his church is most concerned)
it is desired that the propositions concerning the covenant be likewise
turned into an ordinance, with a considerable penalty: that so we may
give some real evidence that we do not seek the things of this world in
the first place, and the kingdom of heaven, and the righteousness of it,
in the last; much less that, Demas-like, we forsake it as lovers of this
present world.
Now the grounds and reasons for such an
ordinance may be these:-
1. It were a great unthankfulness to God,
if, after sacred and solemn vows made in time of our greatest dangers,
and when, after our vows, God hath begun to deliver us, and hath
dissipated our enemies, we should now grow weary of paying and
performing those vows. We may say of the covenant as the prophet said of
the laying of the foundation of the second temple, Consider whether from
that very day God did not sensibly bless us, and give a testimony from
heaven to his own cause and covenant. And now shall the covenant, which
was our glory and ornament before God and men, be laid aside as a worn
or moth-eaten garment? God forbid.
2. If the taking of the solemn league and
covenant be not enjoined by authority of parliaments, under a penalty,
but left arbitrary, this were an opening instead of shutting of the door
unto as many as are apt and inclinable to refuse and oppose the
covenant, yea, to as many as write or speak against it, and maintain
opinions or practices contrary to it. The impiety and obstinacy of such
persons, if not punished, but connived at, or tacitly permitted by the
parliaments, involveth them and the nation as partakers of the sin, and
so consequently of the judgment.
Although the oath which Joshua and the
princes of Israel made to the Gibeonites was made unadvisedly, and
without asking counsel from the mouth of the Lord, yet, some hundred
years after, being broken, that breach brought a national judgment, till
justice was done upon the offenders. How much more may a national
judgment be feared, if even in our days the contempt and violation of a
most lawful and sacred oath be winked at? Surely God will not wink at
their sin who wink at his dishonour. Better not to have vowed than not
to pay and perform.
3. When king Josiah made a solemn
covenant (the effect whereof was a thorough reformation, the taking away
of the ancient and long-continued high places, the destroying of Baal's
vessels, altars, priests, &c. 2 Kings xxiii., throughout), he did
not leave his covenant arbitrary; but "he caused all that were
present in Jerusalem and Benjamin to stand to it," 2 Chron. xxxiv.
32. In all which he is set forth as a precedent to Christian reformers,
that they may know their duty in like cases.
4. All who did take the solemn league and
covenant are thereby obliged in their several places and callings (and
so the houses of parliament in their place and calling) to endeavour the
extirpation of Popery, prelacy, heresy, schism, superstition and
profaneness. How is this part of the oath of God fulfilled, if the
covenant itself, made for the extirpation of all these, be left
arbitrary?
5. The vow and protestation was not left
arbitrary; for by the vote, July 30, 1641, it was resolved upon the
question, that whosoever would not take that protestation are declared
to be unfit to bear any office in the church or state, which was
accordingly published. But the solemn league and covenant must be at
least more effectual than the protestation, for the narrative, or
preface of the covenant, holdeth forth the necessity of the same as a
more effectual means to be used after other means of supplication,
remonstrance, and protestation.
6. This same solemn league and covenant
was not in the beginning left arbitrary, for some members were suspended
from the house for not taking it. And in the ordinance, Feb. 2, 1643, it
is ordained and enjoined, that it be solemnly taken in all places
throughout the kingdom of England, and dominion of Wales. And withal, in
the instructions and orders of parliament then sent into the committees,
it was appointed that the names of such as refuse it should be returned
to the parliament, that they may take such further course with them as
they might think fit. In the ordinance of parliament for ordination of
ministers (both the first and last ordinance), the person to be ordained
is appointed and obliged to address himself to the presbytery, "and
bring with him a testimony of his taking the covenant of the three
kingdoms." Again, by the ordinance for election of elders, dated
the 19th of August 1645, no member of any congregation may concur or
have voice in the choosing of elders but such as have taken the national
covenant.
7. In the first article of the treaty
between the kingdoms, signed Nov. 29, 1643, it is agreed and concluded,
that the covenant be sworn and subscribed by both kingdoms, not that it
shall be taken by as many as will in both kingdoms, but that it shall be
taken by both kingdoms. How shall this be performed if it be still left
arbitrary?
8. In the propositions of peace it is
plainly supposed and intimated, that the taking of the covenant shall be
enjoined under some penalty, otherwise we have not dealt faithfully,
neither with God nor man, in tendering that second proposition to the
king concerning his consent to an act of parliament in both kingdoms
respectively for the enjoining the taking of the covenant by all the
subjects of the three kingdoms, with such penalties as, by mutual advice
of both kingdoms, shall be agreed upon.
9. If other propositions of peace be
turned into ordinances, and this of the covenant not so, it will
strengthen the calumnies cast upon the parliament by the malignant
party, that they have had no intention to settle religion according to
the covenant, but that they entered into the covenant for brining in the
Scots to their assistance, and for gaining the good opinion of the
reformed churches.
10. It will also be a dangerous precedent
to separate between the legislative power and the corrective or punitive
power. For if after the ordinance of parliament enjoining and ordaining
that the covenant be taken universally throughout the whole kingdom
there be no sanction nor penalty upon those who shall refuse it, let
wise men judge whether this may not expose the authority of parliament
to contempt.
11. I shall conclude with this syllogism,
That which is not only sinful in itself, but a great dishonour to God, a
great scandal to the church, and withal a disobedience to the lawful
ordinance of authority, may and ought to be punished by this Christian
and reforming parliament. But their offence which still refuse to take
the covenant is not only sinful in itself, but a great dishonour to God,
and great scandal to the church, and withal a disobedience to the lawful
ordinance of authority.
Therefore the offence of those who still
refuse to take the covenant, may and ought to be punished by this
Christian and reforming parliament.
Obj. 1. The covenant ought not to be
compulsory but free. Good things grow evil when men's consciences are
thereunto forced. Ans. 1. An ordinance enjoining the taking of it under
a certain penalty were not other compulsion than was used by king Josiah
and others, yea by this present parliament upon their own members, and
upon ministers to be ordained, as is evident by the passages above
expressed. The parliament hath also, by their ordinance dated the 23d of
August 1645, imposed the Directory of Worship under certain mulets and
penalties to be inflicted upon such as do not observe it, or preach or
write against it. 2. It is no tyranny over men's consciences to punish a
great and scandalous sin (such as the refusing and opposing of the
covenant, or a dividing from it), although the offender in his
conscience believe it to be no sin, yea, peradventure, believe it to be
a duty, otherwise it had been tyranny over the conscience to punish
those who killed the apostles, because they thought they were doing God
good service, John xvi. 2. 3. If they who make this objection be so
tender of men's consciences why would they keep up an army when there is
no enemy, and continue taxes and burdens upon the exhausted counties
which are altogether against the consciences of the generality of people
in the kingdom. If in these things they will have the conscience of any
to be forced, and in the covenant the consciences of some left at
liberty, this is not fair and equal, and it will be generally
apprehended that such men study their own interest more than that of the
public.
Obj. 2. The covenant was occasional and
temporary, being made upon the occasion of the prevalency and growing
power of the enemy (as is mentioned in the narrative), which foundation
being taken away the superstructure cannot stand. Ans. 1. Ex malis
moribus bonae nascuntur leges. Shall we therefore be no longer bound
to obey and maintain good laws, because the evils which gave occasion to
their making have ceased? 2. The covenant doth, in express words, oblige
us constantly, and all the days of our lives, to pursue the ends therein
expressed; so that to hold it but a temporary obligation is a breach of
covenant. 3. There is not any one of the ends of the covenant which is
yet fully attained. The very Directory of Worship is not observed in
most places of the kingdom; neither is the abolition of prelacy, and of
the book of Common Prayer, yet established by act of parliament. 4. If
we had attained the ends of the covenant (which we have not), yet non
minor est virtus quam quarere parta tueri, and the recidivation may
prove worse than the first disease.
Obj. 3. Some things in the covenant are
disputable, for instance, good and learned men differ in their opinions
about prelacy. Ans. 1. The oath of supremacy was much more disputable,
and great disputes there were among good and learned men about it, yet
it hath been imposed upon all members of parliament. 2. If the very
materials of the covenant be stuck at, whether they be good in
themselves, there is the greater danger to leave all men to abound in
their own sense, concerning things of the highest consequence.
Obj. 4. The army which hath served us so
faithfully, and regained our liberties, shall by this ordinance lose
their own greatest liberty, which is the liberty of their consciences.
Ans. 1. In the ordinance and instructions of parliament, dated the 2d
Feb. 1643, it was ordained that the covenant should be speedily sent to
my Lord General, and the Lord Admiral, and all other
commanders-in-chief, governors of towns, &c., to the end it may be
taken by all officers and soldiers under their command. I hope the
parliament did not here take from their army the liberty of their
consciences. 2. The army must either take laws from the parliament, or
give laws to the parliament. If they will, as the parliament's servants,
submit themselves to its ordinances (which hath ever been professed they
would do), then the objection is taken away; but if they will be the
parliament's masters or fellows, and independent of the parliament
itself, and at liberty to reject as they list so good or wholesome an
ordinance as the taking of the covenant, then God have mercy upon us, if
the parliament do not preserve their own rights and privileges, with
which the kingdom hath intrusted them. 3. If an ordinance, imposing the
taking of the covenant under a considerable penalty, be to the army scandalum
acceptum, the not passing of such an ordinance will be scandalum
datum to the city of London, and to many thousands of the godly and
well-affected of the kingdom, both ministers and people, who have
faithfully adhered to and served the parliament, and will still hazard
their lives and fortunes in pursuance of the ends of the covenant; yea,
a horrible scandal to the reformed churches abroad, whose hearts were
once comforted and raised up to expect better things. 4. God forbid
there be any such in the houses of parliament as would admit of
deformation instead of reformation, and all manner of confusion in place
of government. Would not this be the ready way to banish all religion,
and open a door for all sorts of schism and heresy? And shall this be
the fruits of the labours, blood and expenses, of the three kingdoms, in
place of reformation and uniformity, to admit of such a liberty and
horrible confusion? Let it not be told in Gath, nor published in Askelon,
least the Philistines rejoice, least the daughters of the uncircumcised
triumph!
Excerpted from the Works of
George Gillespie. |
|

Back to
George Gillespie
|